FAQ's

MO.D.I.P. is responsible, in particular, for:
1)a) the development of a specific policy, strategy and the necessary procedures for the continuous improvement of the quality of the institution's work and services, which constitutes the institution's internal quality assurance system, b) the organization, operation and continuous improvement of the internal the institution's quality assurance system, c) the coordination and support of the evaluation procedures of the academic units and other services of the institution and d) the support of the external evaluation and certification procedures of the study programs and the institution's internal quality assurance system, within the framework of the principles, directions and instructions of ADIP.

2. The institution's internal quality assurance system and its implementation procedures are determined by the Council's decision, which is issued following a proposal by the rector and is published in the Government Gazette, as well as on the institution's website. The above shall be reviewed at the latest every six years.

3. For the above purposes, MO.DI.P. collaborates with HAHE, develops an information system for managing the evaluation data and is responsible for the systematic monitoring and publication, on the institution's website, of the evaluation-related procedures and their results.

4. The Institution's Internal Regulations define the issues related to the organization and operation of the MO.DI.P., as well as its more specific responsibilities. (Law 4009/2011, Article 14)

In the context of the S.D.P. it is necessary to collect and process a lot of data from all the entities that make up AUTH. A fundamental characteristic that governs its development is the utilization and support of elements and data that are already available or collected by AUTH's units or services. For this reason, every possible effort is made to connect the S.D.P. with other systems, such as the Student Care applications of K.H.D., P.Y.KA. ,the central user authentication mechanism of AUTH, IT Center, the applications of the Central Administration (Management of Personnel, Financial Affairs & Supplies, Educational Programs), the I.K.E.E. of the Central Library, the Researcher's File and the ResCom of the Research Committee. At the same time, the development of the S.D.P. creates the right conditions for: Reliability control, homogenization and synchronization of quality-related raw data (between different systems and applications). Upgrading applications when they do not provide the necessary quality-related data. The improvement of existing administrative procedures and the creation of new ones, where and when deemed necessary, for the registration of the necessary data that are related to quality.

The Quality System is reviewed by its Management at regular intervals and periodically certified by HAHE.

Accreditation is a quality assurance process implemented on the basis of specific, predefined, internationally accepted and previously publicized quantitative and qualitative criteria and indicators, harmonized with the Principles and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG 2015). The purpose of the certification is to ensure the quality of Higher Education, as well as the efficiency and transparency of the overall operation of Universities.

Yes. The Certification process is provided for in the legislation (law 4009/2011).

The Department's Internal Evaluation Team (abbreviated O.ME.A.) is responsible for conducting the internal evaluation process in the relevant academic unit. The Internal Evaluation Team is defined by the academic unit undergoing assessment, by decision of its General Assembly. It is composed of distinguished members of D.E.P., of the ranks of Professor and Associate Professor, preferably with experience in quality assurance procedures. A representative of the students also participates.

Evaluation consists in the systematic, documented and detailed assessment, marking and recording of the work of higher education institutions, with the use of objective criteria, and the critical analysis και identification of existing weaknesses and discrepancies in connection with the academic profile, objectives and mission of institutions. Evaluation of the work performed by institutions is performed in two stages: a. internal evaluation carried out by institutions themselves, and b. external evaluation carried out by a panel of independent experts under the supervision of the HQA. The internal evaluation process is a periodical participatory process which is carried out under the auspices of the institution’s QAU. It is basically a self-evaluation process, which gives the very identity of the institution (or its academic unit) as it reflects and highlights all areas of its operation, positive and negative, and documents the institution’s or unit’s ambitions. The internal evaluation process is concluded with the preparation of the internal evaluation report, which is approved by the institution’s (or the academic unit’s) administration and is then forwarded to the HQA in order for the external evaluation process to commence.Read More

As part of ΗΑΗΕ’s responsibilities and in accordance with its institutional framework, the Authority, in 2015 developed the National Information System for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (NISQA), which is structured in 5 subsystems: a) Data of Quality of Higher Education, b) Business Intelligence, c) Register of Experts, d) Accreditation Management, e) Internal Operation. Read More

The users/responsible for registering data are created internally in the information system by the Administrators of the Institutions (MO.DIP.). Each user/responsible for registration is invited to coordinate the data collection procedures of their Department and then register them in the system. Users register data exclusively for the Departments assigned to them, as well as for the Study Programs (Undergraduate, Postgraduate and Doctoral), belonging to the specific Departments, in accordance with the instructions and the quality data manual issued by HAHE for each edition of the system. (https://qdata.ethaae.gr/Home/Help#section3).

The same user is registered twice in the MODIP system with the same email. User actions: Inform the system administrators at qms@auth.gr

1. Contact the Department Secretariat to correct the information in the student record. 2. Contact the system administrators at qms@auth.gr to separate synonyms with other faculty members.

The information related to the course information is wrongly entered in the Secretariat system. Contact the Department Secretariat to declare the correct information in the student log system

1. There is a mismatch between the email used to log in and the email registered in the Secretariat's system 2. Error in the MODIP system regarding access rights. User actions: 1. Declaration to the Secretariat of your School/Department of the email, which is used to authenticate you by the Network Operations Center. 2. Communication with MODIP system administrators (qms@auth.gr)

Declaration of the correct information to the Secretariat of your School/Department.

1. The course is declared as an inactive course in the Secretariat system. 2. The course has not been assigned to the teacher by the Secretariat. 3. At the start of a new academic semester, no courses are displayed on the Professor's page for the current semester, until the corresponding classes are created by the Secretariat. Contact the Secretariat of your department.

1. The faculty member's university email is not registered in the Secretariat's system. 2. There is a mismatch between the email used to log in and the email registered in the Secretariat's system. 3. The faculty member's name is not associated with any course in the Secretariat system. 4. The faculty member's name is not linked to a Faculty/Department in the Secretariat system. User actions: 1. Declaration of the university email to the Secretariat of your School/Department 2. Declaration of the university email, which is used for your certification by the Network Operations Center, to the Secretariat of the Department in which the user belongs to. 3. Declaration to the Faculty/Department Secretariat of the faculty member's courses which are not registered

The optional fields of the questionnaire were not filled in by the student - System error. Try again or contact MODIP qms@auth.gr

Contact the teacher who distributed the codes.

1. Contact the Department Secretariat to confirm the statements. 2. Contact the IT Center HelpDesk (https://it.auth.gr/contact/).

he student's APM is not registered in the Secretariat's system. User actions: Declaration of the student's APM at the Secretariat of the Department to which it belongs.